Looking for:
Aiag msa manual pdf free download |
Monday, February 6, 2023
Aiag msa manual pdf free download -
- AIAG - -
Loading Changes. Please wait. View List. Sign Up For Training Now. It is focused primarily on the provision of outputs This document defines the vocabulary of terms used in the ISO series of standards. The Road Vehicles - Functional Safety - Part Guidelines On ISO document provides an overview of the ISO series of standards, as well as giving additional explanations, and is intended to enhance the understanding of the other parts of the ISO series of standards.
It has an informative character only and describes the general concepts of the ISO series of standards in order to facilitate comprehension. The explanation expands from general concepts to specific contents. In the case of inconsistencies between this do It contains possible interpretations of other parts of ISO with respect to semiconductor development. The content is not exhaustive with regard to possible interpretations, i.
The Road Vehicles - Functional Safety - Part Adaptation Of ISO For Motorcycles document specifies the requirements for adaptation for motorcycles, including the following: -- general topics for adaptation for motorcycles; -- safety culture; -- confirmation measures; -- hazard analysis and risk assessment; -- vehicle integration and testing; and -- safety validation. Annex A provides an overview on objectives, prerequisites and work products of this document.
The Road Vehicles - Functional Safety - Part 2: Management Of Functional Safety document specifies the requirements for functional safety management for automotive applications, including the following: -- project-independent requirements with regard to the organizations involved overall safety management , and -- project-specific requirements with regard to the management activities in the safety lifecycle, i.
This document specifies the requirements for the concept phase for automotive applications, including the following: -- item definition; -- hazard analysis and risk assessment; and -- functional safety concept. The Road Vehicles - Functional Safety - Part 4: Product Development At The System Level document specifies the requirements for product development at the system level for automotive applications, including the following: -- general topics for the initiation of product development at the system level; -- specification of the technical safety requirements; -- the technical safety concept; -- system architectural design; -- item integration and testing; and -- safety validation.
Annex A provides an overview on objectives, pre The Road Vehicles - Functional Safety - Part 5: Product Development At The Hardware Level document specifies the requirements for product development at the hardware level for automotive applications, including the following: -- general topics for the product development at the hardware level; -- specification of hardware safety requirements; -- hardware design; -- evaluation of the hardware architectural metrics; -- evaluation of safety goal violations due to random hardware failures; and -- hardware integration and verificat The Road Vehicles - Functional Safety - Part 6: Product Development At The Software Level document specifies the requirements for product development at the software level for automotive applications, including the following: -- general topics for product development at the software level; -- specification of the software safety requirements; -- software architectural design; -- software unit design and implementation; -- software unit verification; -- software integration and verification; and -- testing of the embedded so The Road Vehicles - Functional Safety - Part 7: Production, Operation, Service And Decommissioning document specifies the requirements for production, operation, service and decommissioning, including related planning activities.
The Road Vehicles - Functional Safety - Part 8: Supporting Processes document specifies the requirements for supporting processes, including the following: -- interfaces within distributed developments; -- overall management of safety requirements; -- configuration management; -- change management; -- verification; -- documentation management; -- confidence in the use of software tools; -- qualification of software components; -- evaluation of hardware elements; -- proven in use argument; -- interfacing an appli This standard enables the industry to move from a traditional 2-D drawing world to a full 3-D model, which is completely annotated; contains all the information necessary to manufacture the part.
Document identifies what Digital Engineering Visualization is, and how it can be utilized. Implementing the tools and processes in this guideline will help enable global engineering collaboration and standards within the worldwide automotive industry.
The recommendations are partitioned into four topic areas: 1 Format, 2 Process, 3 Time Period, and 4 Quality Assurance. This document addresses the set of process recommendations. In particular, this document aims to provide a company with the key activities, inputs, outputs, controls and mechanisms needed to fully support the long term archiving and retriev This document contains an assessment of the current state of LTAR and the future vision within the auto industry.
Includes the necessary tools to identify tasks, deliverables, and work stream timelines for projects. This document identifies PPAP requirements for all service parts. These requirements are intended to be clarifications to the PPAP process for service parts and not additional requirements.
The Quick Start Guide covers about 90 percent of the full manual's SPC applications in a succinct format with text and graphics and includes examples of the most commonly used control charts with easy-to-understand calculation sheets. Suppliers have struggled in the past with quickly finding answers to their SPC-r Providing easy to understand examples of commonly used short run charts, the SPC Short Run Supplement is a guideline used to analyze, monitor and control process that do not satisfy the sampling requirements of standard SPC charts.
This document is not intended to supplant the SPC Refere The new Brazing System Assessment specifies process requirements for an organization or its suppliers performing applicable aluminum and stainless steel brazing. It is a collective effort by OEM and Tier 1 customers to create common process requirements for foundries, requirements which our shared experiences tell us will benefit the foundry industry for their OEM automotive customers.
The document comes with an Excel file to complete as part of the assessment. Now in its third edition, the Coating System Assessment has been updated and revised for greater clarity, and to include the ISO and IATF Quality Management System concepts, "process approach" and "risk management.
The CQI-9 4th Edition is a comprehensive audit covering the most common heat treat processes employed by the automotive industry. Intended to provide a common approach to a heat treat management system for automotive production and service part organizations, the 4th edition now includes additional best practices, along with new and modified requirements and clarifications for supply organizations to consider in making their own self-assessments.
AIAG's Molding System Assessment is a common process approach to control molding processes and a methodology to evaluate and remediate current processes. It also provides best practices for continual improvement, emphasizing defect prevention and the reduction of variation and waste in the supply chain, and includes a downloadable assessment with forms to complete the assessment. Over 30 years ago, AIAG collaborated with the domestic automotive manufacturers to develop common quality methods and tools, which became known as the Quality Core Tools.
The tools proved so useful that they were adopted by other manufacturing sectors, including aerospace, defense, medical, and pharmaceutical. Today, most automotive manufacturers and suppliers require use of one or more of the Core Tools.
Production Part Approval Process PPAP is the industry standard that ensures engineering design and product specification requirements are met.
Statistical Process Control SPC describes several basic and advanced statistical methods to ensure your process improvements are more effective. As data quality improves, decision quality improves. The Measurement Life Cycle concept expresses the belief that the measurement methods may change over time as one learns and improves the process.
For example, measurement may start on a product characteristic to establish stability and capability of the process. This may lead to an understanding of critical process control characteristics that directly affect the part characteristics.
Dependency on part characteristic information becomes less and the sampling plan may be reduced to signify this understanding five parts per hour sample reduced to one part per shift. Also, the method of measurement may change from a CMM measurement, to some form of attribute gaging. Eventually it may be found that very little part monitoring may be required as long as the process is maintained or measuring and monitoring the maintenance and tooling may be all that is needed.
The level of measurement follows the level of process understanding. Most of the measuring and monitoring could eventually end up at suppliers of incoming material. The same measurement, on the same characteristic, at the same area of the process, over an extensive period of time is evidence of a lack of learning or a stagnant measurement process.
Before a measurement system can be purchased, a detailed engineering concept of the measurement process is developed. Using the purpose developed above, a cross-functional team of individuals will develop a plan and concept for the measurement system required by the design. Here are some guidelines: The team needs to evaluate the design of the subsystem or component and identify important characteristics.
These are based on customer requirements and the functionality of the subsystem or component to the total system. If the important dimensions have been identified already, evaluate the ability to measure the characteristics. For example, if the important characteristic of a plastic injection molded component was on the mold parting line, the dimensional check would be difficult and measurement variation would be high.
One method to capture issues similar to these would be to use a FMEA process to analyze areas of risk in gage design both from an ability to measure to the part to the functionality gage Design and Process FMEA. This would aid in the development of the maintenance and calibration plan. Develop a flow chart showing critical process steps in the manufacturing or assembly of the part or subsystem.
Identify key inputs and outputs to each step in the process. This will aid in the development of the measurement equipment criteria and requirements affected by the location in the process. Chapter I — Section C Measurement Strategy and Planning 27 A measurement plan, a list of measurement types, comes out of this investigation. P 13 For complex measurement systems, a flow chart is made of the measurement process. This would include delivery of the part or sub-system being measured, the measurement itself, and the return of the part or sub-system to the process.
Next use some method of brainstorming with the group to develop general criteria for each measurement required. One of the simple methods to use is a cause and effect diagram. The flow chart and initial discussion will facilitate the identification of the key individuals. Will the data be used for control, sorting, qualification, etc? The way the measurement will be used can change the sensitivity level of the measurement system.
What is the product specification? What is the expected process variability? How much of a difference between parts will the gage need to detect?
Who will do the training? Will it be done manually, on a moving conveyor, off-line, automatically, etc? Are the part location and fixturing possible sources of variation? Contact or non-contact? Who will be responsible for the calibration masters? Will the part be clean, oily, hot, etc.? Remember to use data to substantiate common assumptions about the measurement process. It is better to be safe and collect data on the environment, rather than to make decisions based on the wrong information and having a system developed that is not robust to environmental issues.
Chapter I — Section C Measurement Strategy and Planning 28 Current measurement methods should be researched prior to investing in new equipment. Proven measurement methods may provide more reliable operation. Where possible, use measurement equipment that has a proven track record.
During and after the fabrication of the measurement equipment and development of the measurement process methods, training, documentation, etc.
These studies and data will be used to understand this measurement process so that this process and future processes may be improved. It has been constructed to be a self-contained discussion about the process of developing a measurement process quotation package, obtaining responses to that package, awarding the project, completing final design, developing the measurement process, and, finally, marrying that measurement process to the production process for which it was created.
It is strongly encouraged that this chapter not be used without reading and understanding the entire discussion about a measurement process. To obtain the most benefit from the measurement process, study and address it as a process with inputs and outputs.
P 15 This chapter was written with the team philosophy in mind. It is not a job description for the buyer or purchasing agent. The activities described here will require team involvement to be completed successfully and it should be administered within the overall framework of an Advanced Product Quality Planning APQP team.
This can result in healthy interplay between various team functions — concepts arising out of the planning process may be modified before the gage supplier arrives at a final design that satisfies the measurement system requirements. The customer and supplier s need to thoroughly understand the project requirements, what the deliverables will be and the methods by which both are to be achieved.
This understanding is derived from accurate timely communication between the two parties. Communication between the customer and the supplier at this time is especially important. Since there may be several levels of concept approvals to be carried out, and possible environmental changes and the potential of team members changing, the measurement process project could falter or even fail.
Initial responsibility for this may lie with the product design engineer, dimensional control, etc. When datum schemes do not match throughout a manufacturing process, particularly in the measurement systems, this leads to a situation where the wrong things may be measured, and there may be fit problems, etc.
There may be times when a datum scheme used in a final assembly cannot possibly match that used in a sub-component manufacturing process. When such is the case, it can be established as early as possible in the APQP process so that all team members understand possible difficulties and conflicts that may lie ahead and have every opportunity to do something about it. During this process, different datum schemes may need to be explored in order to understand the impact of these differences.
Certain commodities present features which can yield more problems than others, such as camshaft centering, or other round, cylindrical or tubular characteristics.
For example, a camshaft must be manufactured on centers but the important product features are in its lobes. One method or datum scheme may be required for manufacturing whereas another scheme is required for measurement of the final product measurement.
However this should not detract from consideration of these issues with appropriate team members early in the APQP process.
It is assumed that the gage supplier will be involved with the APQP process, a team approach. The gage supplier will develop a clear appreciation of the overall production process and product usage so that his role is understood not only by him but by others on the team manufacturing, quality, engineering, etc.
For instance, the APQP team without much input from a gage source may develop certain gage concepts. Other concepts may require the expertise of the gage source. This may be driven by the complexity of the measurement system and a team decision as to what makes sense. Gage Source Selection Process Develop the Quotation Package Before a measurement process request for quotation package can be supplied to a potential supplier for formal proposals, a detailed engineering concept of the measurement process needs to be developed.
The team of individuals that will employ and be responsible for the maintenance and continual improvement of the measurement process have direct responsibility for developing the detailed concept. This can be part of the APQP team. To better develop this concept, several questions need to be answered.
The team may research various issues to help decide which direction or path will be followed for designing the measurement process. Some may be dictated or heavily implied by the product design. Before a customer asks a supplier to suggest solutions to process problems, the foundation and intent of the process needs to be thoroughly understood and anticipated by the team that owns that process.
Then and only then will the process be properly used, supported and improved upon. What activities should be scheduled for preventive maintenance e. Much of these activities will depend on the complexity of the measurement system, device or apparatus. Simpler gages may require only an inspection at regular intervals, whereas more complex systems may require ongoing detailed statistical analyses and a team of engineers to maintain in a predictive fashion.
Planning preventive maintenance activities should coincide with the initiation of the measurement process planning. Many activities, such as draining air filters daily, lubricating bearings after the designated number of operating hours, etc. In fact this is preferable and improves advanced measurement planning and costs.
Data collection methods and maintenance recommendations related to these activities can be obtained from the original manufacturer, or developed by plant engineering, manufacturing and quality personnel. After the measurement process is implemented and in use, data pertaining to the function of the measurement process need to be collected and plotted over time.
Simple analytical methods run charts, trend analysis can be conducted to determine the stability of the system. Eventually, as the judgment of system stability dictates, preventive maintenance routines can be scheduled accordingly. Conducting preventive maintenance on a stable system, based on time series information, will be less wasteful than conducting preventive maintenance on a system with traditional techniques.
Specifications serve as guidelines for both the customer and supplier in the design and build process. These guidelines serve to communicate acceptable standards. Cost issues may affect the format. Generally, it is a good idea to have sufficient documented design detail that the design may be built or repaired to original intent by any qualified builder — however, this decision Specifications
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Looking for: Manual underwriter Click here to download MANUAL Manual underwriter. Underwriter Manual Our editorial team does n...
-
Looking for: 2006 volkswagen beetle owners manual free download Click here to download MANUAL - Volkswagen Workshop Repair | ...
-
Looking for: Download npm package manually Click here to download MANUAL - HOWTO: Inspect, Download and Extract NPM Packages ...
No comments:
Post a Comment